The Dangerous Dogs Act (1991) remains a highly debated piece of legislation in the UK, designed to enhance public safety by banning certain dog breeds considered potentially dangerous.
In 2025, the UK Government launched a comprehensive inquiry into the Act to evaluate its effectiveness and to consider updates reflecting current knowledge and public safety needs.
The Act was introduced in 1991 with the aim of protecting the public from attacks by dogs deemed dangerous. Four specific breeds faced a ban based on their size, strength, and perceived aggression: the American Bully, the Fila Brasileiro, the Japanese Tosa, and the Dogo Argentino. Ownership of these breeds is illegal without court exemptions and strict controls.
Despite the ban, fatal dog attacks have continued in the UK, with many involving breeds not on the banned list. Between 1991 and 2016, 30 people died from dog-related incidents; fewer than one-third involved banned dogs.
Recent figures show rising hospital admissions for serious dog attacks, indicating a broader issue beyond breed-specific legislation.
New breed listings exemplify evolving concerns. The XL Bully was added to the banned list, effective from late 2023 and early 2024 across UK nations, reflecting updated breed risk assessments.
Moreover, the 2025 Amendment Bill requires decisions on breed restrictions to be based on thorough public consultations and recent fatality data, promoting evidence-led policy.
The inquiry, chaired by Neil Parish MP, seeks to weigh public safety with animal welfare, exploring if the current approach is effective or if new strategies are needed, including considering behaviour assessments and enhanced support for police and local councils.
The goal is creating a balanced framework that protects people while ensuring responsible dog ownership and fair treatment of dogs, regardless of breed.
The government is analysing public submissions and evidence collected during the inquiry. An upcoming oral evidence session will help finalise recommendations.
Potential legislative changes may influence dog ownership rules, breed restrictions, and local authority enforcement practices. Dog owners, especially those interested in or owning banned or restricted breeds, should stay informed.
Statistics show that aggression and risk cannot be determined by breed alone. Responsible ownership, socialisation, training, neutering, and securing dogs appropriately underpin safety in communities.
This inquiry highlights the need to consider individual dog behaviour alongside breed type, promoting education for owners and enforcement supporting safe human-animal interactions.
The inquiry encouraged submissions from the public, professionals, and organisations, reflecting diverse views. Although the submission stage has closed, ongoing public debate continues.
For those looking to acquire a new dog legally and responsibly, resources such as puppies for sale from reputable breeders and adoption centres remain essential.
Stay updated with official government announcements and animal welfare organisations for further news and guidance.