If asked to name one dangerous dog breed, you might mention the Staffordshire Bull Terrier puppies, one of the UK’s banned breeds. Alternatively, many believe that no breed is inherently dangerous; instead, a dog's behaviour is shaped by its treatment and training.
This understanding lies at the heart of the “deed not breed” movement. It suggests that no breed is dangerous by nature, but individual dogs may be potentially harmful if they have been mistreated, poorly trained, or irresponsibly kept.
The “deed not breed” ethos challenges the UK's Dangerous Dogs Act (DDA), in place since 1991, which bans four specific breeds from ownership: the Pit Bull Terrier, Fila Brasilero, Japanese Tosa, and Dogue de Bordeaux puppies. The Act also broadly requires all dogs, regardless of breed, to be controlled and prevented from causing harm, but it is the breed-specific ban that the movement contests most strongly.
In this article, we explore what “deed not breed” truly means, how it relates to the DDA, and whether it offers a fairer alternative. Read on to understand the debate around breed-specific legislation and responsible dog ownership.
The DDA’s banned breeds are linked to a history of being bred for fighting and roles possibly encouraging aggression. Moreover, these breeds can inflict severe harm quickly due to their size and strength.
While this combination raises safety concerns, the Act’s consistency is questioned. Other breeds like the English Bulldog also possess strength and fighting potential but remain legal. This inconsistency fuels debates against breed-specific bans.
The “deed not breed” principle counters the notion that breed alone predicts aggression. It highlights that behaviour and temperament depend largely on how a dog is raised, trained, and managed.
Dog breeds do display certain traits inherited across the breed—such as herding instincts in Border Collies or chasing drives in sighthounds—but aggression is not a fixed innate trait.
Puppies are not born aggressive. Their early experiences, especially before 12 weeks old, shape their lifelong behaviour and temperament. How dogs are treated in their formative period is crucial to ensuring they are safe and reliable companions.
Understanding this highlights the importance of early socialisation, training, and positive human interaction to prevent aggressive behaviours developing in any breed.
The core of the “deed not breed” argument is that no breed is inherently bad or aggressive. Well-treated, properly trained dogs, regardless of breed, typically pose no danger to people or other animals.
Exceptions can occur in any breed, but are not more common in banned breeds than in others like the Springer Spaniel. This suggests focusing on the individual dog’s behaviour yields fairer assessments than blanket bans.
Simply put, a dog that is unlikely to try to harm someone should not be judged by its physical power alone.
For support or advice regarding your own dog’s breed or appearance concerns, the Deed Not Breed non-profit organisation offers valuable information and guidance.
Quick Answer: “Deed not breed” means a dog’s behaviour and temperament should be judged based on its actions, not the breed it belongs to.
This approach discourages breed-specific legislation, advocating instead for responsible dog ownership and training. It emphasises that aggressive tendencies come from upbringing and environment, not genetics. Thus, the focus should be on the individual dog’s deeds rather than assumptions based on appearance or breed.
If you're considering getting a dog, understanding the breed's traits and the legal requirements is essential. Seek a puppy from responsible breeders or reputable rehoming centres to ensure ethical breeding and good health.
Ask breeders about temperament testing, health screenings, and socialisation practices. Consider breeds suited to your lifestyle and avoid breeders who prioritise appearance or profit over welfare.
Remember, purchasing a dog is a long-term commitment to promoting responsible pet ownership and providing a safe, happy home regardless of breed.